Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
B
bolsonaro
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Luc Giffon
bolsonaro
Commits
9830bbe0
Commit
9830bbe0
authored
5 years ago
by
Charly LAMOTHE
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add TODO list of the figure scheme in compute_results.py
parent
211dc83a
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!3
clean scripts
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
code/compute_results.py
+38
-0
38 additions, 0 deletions
code/compute_results.py
with
38 additions
and
0 deletions
code/compute_results.py
+
38
−
0
View file @
9830bbe0
...
...
@@ -116,6 +116,44 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
title
=
'
Loss values of the trained model
'
)
"""
TODO:
For each dataset:
0) A figure for the selection of the best base forest model hyperparameters (best vs default/random hyperparams)
1) A figure for the selection of the best dataset normalization method
2) A figure for the selection of the best combination of dataset: normalization vs D normalization vs weights normalization
3) A figure for the selection of the most relevant subsets combination: train,dev vs train+dev,train+dev vs train,train+dev
4) A figure to finally compare the perf of our approach using the previous selected parameters vs the baseline vs other papers
2)
In all axis:
- untrained forest
- trained base forest (straight line cause it doesn
'
t depend on the number of extracted trees)
Axis 1:
- test with forest on train+dev and OMP on train+dev
- test with forest on train+dev and OMP on train+dev with dataset normalization
- test with forest on train+dev and OMP on train+dev with dataset normalization + D normalization
- test with forest on train+dev and OMP on train+dev with dataset normalization + weights normalization
- test with forest on train+dev and OMP on train+dev with dataset normalization + D normalization + weights normalization
Axis 2:
- test with forest on train and OMP on dev
- test with forest on train and OMP on dev with dataset normalization
- test with forest on train and OMP on dev with dataset normalization + D normalization
- test with forest on train and OMP on dev with dataset normalization + weights normalization
- test with forest on train and OMP on dev with dataset normalization + D normalization + weights normalization
Axis 3:
- test with forest on train and OMP train+dev
- test with forest on train and OMP train+dev with dataset normalization
- test with forest on train and OMP train+dev with dataset normalization + D normalization
- test with forest on train and OMP train+dev with dataset normalization + weights normalization
- test with forest on train and OMP train+dev with dataset normalization + D normalization + weights normalization
IMPORTANT: Same seeds used in all axis.
"""
# Plot the density of the weights
Plotter
.
weight_density
(
file_path
=
args
.
results_dir
+
os
.
sep
+
experiment_id
+
os
.
sep
+
'
density_weight.png
'
,
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment