@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Let _c_ denote the candidate sequence possibly with a determiner _d_, a classifi
Is the candidate sequence obviously a proper name? I.e. is the annotator confident about the existence of the naming convention concerning the sequence? For large classes of NEs (except person names, which fail to exhibit synonyms), this test can be reformulated in a way which is similar to the [LEX](Criteres-lexicaux#41-figement-des-%C3%A9l%C3%A9ments-lexicalement-pleins-t%C3%AAte-ou-compl%C3%A9ment-lex-et-term). Namely, when replacing one of the components of the candidate sequence by a synonym or a hyperonym is the reference to the initial entity lost?
Examples:
* _Pierre Martin habite à Maisons-Alfort_ - both _Pierre Martin_ (PERS) and _Maisons-Alfort_ (LOC) are clearly proper names. Notably, _Habitations-Alfort_ ne permet pas de garder le même référent. Test passed.
* _Pierre Martin habite à Maisons-Alfort_ - both _Pierre Martin_ (PERS) and _Maisons-Alfort_ (LOC) are clearly proper names. Notably, _Habitations-Alfort_ cannot have the same referent. Test passed.
* _A Maisons-Alfort il y a plusieurs personnes nommées Pierre Martin_ - both _Pierre Martin_ (PERS) and _Maisons-Alfort_ (LOC) are clearly proper names. Test passed.
* _Structures d’insertion par l’activité économique en Vendée_ - it is not obvious that _Structures d’insertion par l’activité économique_ (no NE) is subject to a naming convention. The LEX-like test is hard to apply. Test not passed.
* _La fédération des entreprises d'insertion du Pays de la Loire_ - it is not obvious that _la fédération des entreprises d'insertion_ (ORG) is subject to a naming convention. The LEX-like test is hard to apply. Test not passed.
